Tuesday, July 10, 2007

Did the pseudo "rev" help flag anti-Jihad sites as hate speech?

They seem to think so at over at Jawa Report, and it certainly follows the pattern that Mr. Sutter and his buddy, disbarred Minnesota attorney Dann Dobson, have established. Both Dobson and Sutter are self-appointed inquisitors who threaten people with the loss of their email account or their internet access for what they perceive to be "hate speech" (i.e. not agreeing with their world view). This is well within Dobson and Sutter's long established behavior as internet bullies. They are so obsessed with their "crusade" to save those poor, down trodden terrorists and terrorist supporters, from hate speech that going around flagging anti-terrorist blogs all day isn't a problem at all, not to mention writing fictional "exposés", articles, letters, emails and complaints about what Sutter and his buddy Dobson think are "hate sites".


Sutter was practically pissing in his electronic pants because certain sites have been classified as "hate speech": sites I might add that have been very critical of his fictional "exposés," and both Jihad Watch and Foehammer’s Anvil have banned Sutter.

Good News on Spreading Ban of Hate Speech Site

Good News! Getting the word out about the dangers of hate mongers is working!

Over the past few days, we have received encouraging news that more and more corporations, agencies, and Internet filtering systems are blacklisting or banning access to Jihad Watch, properly identifying it as a hate speech site. First, we received word that Spencer's Jihad Watch site has, in very recent days, been blocked or banned by: City of Chicago, Chicago Police, Bank of America, Fidelity Investments, Deutsche Bank, the Veterans' Administration, Washington Mutual, Site Coach (an Internet filtering program), GE, JP Morgan Chase, Defense Finance and Accounting Services, the U.S. Government, MSNBC, AFSCME, Marriott Corp., and American Airlines.

http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/017237.php
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/017242.php


Now we've received an update on the rapidly spreading ban on Jihad Watch. It has now been including in the commercial filtering of Secure Computing's "WebWasher" as hate speech. This means that WebWasher's 19,000 customers, supported by a worldwide network of partners, include the majority of the Dow Jones Global 50 and the most prominent organizations in banking, financial services, healthcare, telecommunications, manufacturing, public utilities, and federal and local governments, will now be blocking access to Jihad Watch. We have also learned that WebWasher has blocked the hate speech sites of HotAir and MEMRI, and that the Foehammer's Anvil hate speech site has also been blocked or banned as hate speech by site monitoring services, and that other web filtering services are in the process of blocking Jihad Watch, et al.

Good job, and Congratulations to those who had the good sense to ban hate speech, recognizing that hate speech often leads to extremism, and extremism very often leads to terrorism. Secure Computing's Webwasher seems to be the most alert program to use for filtering Internet content from obscenities, hate speech, and other unwanted sites.


http://www.rightwingnews.com/

http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/017263.php


UPDATE: 7/7/07

UPDATE: Spencer's website of hate: Jihad Watch, is now banned in the UK. Spencer's blogs of Jihad Watch and Dhimmi Watch have now been listed in three major Internet blocking programs, along with a great multitude of corporations and government computer systems. In just one instance, through the use of a web filtering program known as Site Kiosk 6, Jihad watch has been identified as a hate speech site, and such hate speech is illegal in the UK. Site Kiosk has been updated and downloaded to their clients in order to block access to Jihad Watch.


Sutter has a agenda. He wants ISPs to ban access to "hate sites" (the Sutter definition of "hate"). He wants Microsoft to block access to these "hate sites" with Internet Explorer. Sutter want to remove sites that he doesn't approve of from the web altogether.

Sutter's ultimate goal? Why indictments of course! Because as Sutter will tell you "hate speech" aids terrorism. Can we say fascist?

Tongue Tied, Foehammer’s Anvil, endiana.com and Vigilant Freedom have all posted articles about this incident.

Technorati Tags:, , , , , , ,
Generated By Technorati Tag Generator

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

It would be nice to know when he won his Navy Cross. Viet Nam? Grenada? Just Cause? Desert Storm. Oddly enough I don't find any recipients named Sutter. Freedom of Information Act anyone?

http://web.archive.org/web/20030302101343/members.aol.com/revjimsutter/revjim.html?mtbrand=AOL_US

Lady Predator said...

Nope, Sutter isn't on the list of Navy Cross recipients. You are right it is time for a FOIA Request to Verifying Sutter's "records".

Anonymous said...

do you have this one up at internet archive? The other has th ribbons but not his claim

Lady Predator said...

Yes,there is this post he made on

bit.listserv.ada-law
he posted "I am now a civilian, but I served my country, and received the Navy Cross, (the highest award from the Navy), the Dept of Defense Medal of Valor, and the Purple Heart. So I like to think that I am somewhat qualified to speak to "espirit de corps". Also his
Rev. Jim's Place in 2002 he posted "US Navy veteran, retired. LCDR. Special interest in counter-terrorism. Four Purple Hearts, one Bronze Star, one Navy
Cross."