In short Sutter *never* was a Lieutenant Commander he did *not* spend 26 years in USN counterterrorism he was never in Afghanistan fighting the Taliban he never went to Naval War College or trained with the IDF. He *never earned *any* medals. He is a impostor who is who fraudulently claiming to be decorated Naval Officer. He has never received The Navy Cross, Medal of Valor, A Presidential Unit Citation, the Bronze Star a Combat Medal and four Purple Hearts.
I wonder if Sutter has ever heard of the Stolen Valor Act of 2005. Then there is the small problem of Sutter impersonating an officer. Maybe Sutter should be watching more NCIS.
Technorati Tags:revjimsutter, impostor, fraud, federal crimes, stolen valor act, foia
Generated By Technorati Tag Generator
34 comments:
You just don't get it do you LP? The records only show 8 months because they are faked. The Government was so impressed with is natural abilities, they made it look like he was only in for 8 months. In reality, he spent the next 25.5 years of his naval career doing deep cover clandestine missions, killing terrorists, getting shot up and basically protecting truth, justice and the American way. They had to put him 'off the books' so to speak, so if, on the off chance, something went wrong and he was killed or captured they could "disavow any knowledge."
ROTFLMAO :)
Damn that was funny. Shall we take bets that will be Sutter's next line?
Your claim is seriously and blatantly lacking --- evidence.
Hope we can get a PDF at your earliest possible convenience.
Meanwhile, WAY TO GO!
Working on that. I want to hide the name and address it went too. You know privacy issues.
To Sutter I suggest you take up your complaint with the Navy. You know these date are in fact true.
What a pathetic looser you are.
I'm waiting, while LMAO, for you to produce whatever you forged this time. Anything short of a copy of my DD-214 will be glaringly obvious. And since you don't know my SSN nor the name I had back then, there's no way you have my DD-214. If you really had anything, you would have put it up with your "announcement."
If you're concerned about hiding your own address, I have that already, heck that's been online for years, easily and publicly available.
Once again, your tactic of desperately trying to distract people from reading the well documented facts about your bigotry is a huge failure. Have you realized yet that your cyber-stalking me, your flaming me all over the web, is responsible for close to 40% of my site traffic? You're sending all kinds of people to my site to read the facts about you and your cohorts. Duh.
Congratulations on winning the Dummy of the Year Award. You can set it on your mantle, right beside your award from Fred Phelps.
I tell you what Sutter prove me wrong post your DD-214. After what do you have to hide?
I'll even post an apology. How about that!
Well now, there's an interesting admission that you don't have the ONLY documentation that proves my time and rank in service. As I said, your claim is pure BS.
I do believe you have missed my point, I'm giving you the opportunity to come clean.
I though you would have jumped a the chance to prove me wrong.
Of course you won't because you can't.
You've proven yourself the fool, once again being caught in a lie. The rules of the game require the one who makes the initial allegation be the one to prove it. You made an allegation that you had my Navy paperwork, showing specific dates of service. So produce my DD214 or let your half-dozen allies know the truth about how gullible they've been in following you. Their alliance has already cost them dearly, and knowing you, it will only get worse. If you want to continue being Satan's servant, then so be it. But you really should let the gullible ones know what you dragged them into, and give them the chance to flee the evil that you embrace.
I've held back quite a bit in the report on you, such as what you did to your daughter, the rituals you and Poke engaged in, and what you're doing with newborns in NC. He really hates you now, he blames you for her death. All of that will be coming out, if not on Hatewatch then when you're in court; there's no way of stopping that. At that point your allies will want to take a long, hot shower to wash the slime off, but no amount of cleansing will be able to remove the contamination from their souls.
Hi Jim,
Would you like to take my word that I have your social security number, or would you like for me to prove it by posting it?
Your call, big guy.
Sutter can lie, but HE KNOWS you have the goods on him.
We know he is lying, and he knows he is lying.
Jim Sutter, you are a liar and you know it.
Wow Sutter you must be really desperate. Telling more *lies* will not make you smell any more vile than you do now. So go ahead post more fiction about me. The more outrageous you lies are the better *I* look. For a "man of God" you really are one hate filled piece of work.
BTW I have no *followers*. That is your envy talking I have friends!
LP- I scrolled through Sutter's comments quickly. Only in going back did I see what he said about you. What a vile person! I am so sorry you have to deal with him.
Thank you AC. I think Sutter is under some delusion that my ex husband and I don't get along. We get along exceptionally well because he is a decent person and was a really great Dad.
Sutter would me making a big mistake pissing him off.
And suggesting that I'm doing something nefarious with newborns here in NC is just Sutter trying to cover one lie with a bigger uglier one. The only problem is the more outrageous his lies become the worse *he* looks.
You have to be able to follow the logic with this fellow, and after 8 beers, I think I have it figured out, so here goes:
Jesus Christ was a baby (Christ = baby)
Catholics take Holy Communion (Host = body of Christ)
When Catholics eat the host, it is transubstantiated into the body of Christ.
The equation would be as such:
Catholics eat Host
Host = body of Christ
Christ = baby
ergo:
Catholics eat babies!
LOL I think you have figured it out. Funny I'm just about to leave for low mass. I will light a candle for Mr Sutter, for truly he is a lost soul.
Wow, I'm in a battle of wits with unarmed opponents. ROFLMAO
"Wow, I'm in a battle of wits with unarmed opponents."?!?
Wow, how utterly original.
I hope the feds don't pick you up for unauthorized use of a stale joke.
Next time you steal, stick to credit cards.
Hmmm...from what I can gather regarding the REVERAND Sutter is that he is hardly any different from anyone else who falsly accuses other people. Our dear REVERAND merely projects his own failings upon others.
He accuses others of "hate" because he himself is filled with it. He accuses others of ignorance and sheer stupidity because he embraces his own shallow misconceptions and deranged beliefs.
What would be so difficult for this "military veteran" with so many claims of valor and achievements to simply post his DD214? Could it be that because his "military service" was of such no-consequence that he never saved it?
And, what sort of "point" is it when "pastor" Sutter says that you have no proof, but then doesn't seem to feel it important to provide any proof of any of his claims himself. Hey "rev," you claim to be a former Navy SEAL and all the rest of it--let's see the proof.
He could silence all of this by simply showing us the proof (no-doubt he's only now trying to "produce" this proof, as soon as he can find an actual DD214 that he can photocopy, scan, and do a credible Photoshop'ed version of his own). Dude, you're a sick person. May you someday receive the full recompense for your disgusting acts.
BTW Mr. Sutter you are more than welcomed to email both my ex husband and Michael Aqunio (who unlike you, had a genuine career as an officer in Army intelligence). You will find that neither of them will verify your invented "facts"!
BTW I noticed you didn't respond to Glen's question about your social security number.
If Glen wants to risk federal privacy act violation charges for posting someone's SSN online, and commit one of the very few offenses that will cause Google to instantly shut down your blog, that's up to him.
Still waiting for you to produce evidence of your claim, Ms. Runyon.
Oh look at the threats, Mr. Sutter Glen *asked* your permission to post *your* SSN. It will only get posted with *your* permission.
FYI all the posturing in the world isn't going to change the fact that you washed out of the Navy in less than a year. (and what you did wasn't .......well you know what you did)
I suggest you read this interesting article about wantabes like you.
http://tinyurl.com/38rzub
You owe *true* veterans a very big apology.
I have tried to wade through some of Sutter's "exposés."
Just allegation after allegation (for example that LP is a Satanist"). He denies what is quite obvious like his criminal record that ANYONE can see online, both through the court websites and the Plain Dealer website.
I don't see how someone can just lie, lie, lie.
Sutter wouldn't know what a fact was if it came up and hit him in the face. His latest lie that Michael Aqunio hired me to stalk someone. The he posts the defamation that Aqunio was on trial for child molestation as part of Satanic rituals. Aquino was never tried or even charged with any crime, anytime, anywhere. (A claim Sutter can't even make) it seems the "Man of God" can't even morally measure up to a Satanist.
The man is so dueled he even thinks Diana “Curio” Napolis was involved in the non-existent case; she wasn’t, she’s a deranged stalker much like Sutter himself. She ended up at Patton State Hospital. All of this information is easily verifiable on the net. Proof that Sutter doesn’t care about facts or the truth
And the man claims to deal in verifiable facts! ROTFLOL!!
I notice that he pulled his fabrication that I was an inpatient at Metropolitan State Hospital for a year. I was employed there. And he claims that I somehow managed to forge court documents (is that a hoot or what?) Oh and I and I’m so good a forging that I can send forged Usenet posts into the past and have them make sense in a thread. I wonder how he explains those Plain Dealer newspapers reports.
I have an uncle who actually experienced all of the things that this phoney preacher claims. The difference between an actual war hero and this cretin is that one who actually experienced the violence and degradation of war, battling an enemy who will kill you if you do not kill HIM first, is that one who actually experiences it does not wish to talk about his "exploits," and when they do, they must be prompted to do so for posterity.
Phony, stolen-honor bastards like Sutter will throw out what he supposedly did at the drop of a hat. All you have to do is see how he brags about his supposed honors and awards, which, by the way, none can be substantuated, to see that he's a disgusting liar.
My uncle (a Marine corporal) was actually wounded in Vietnam, once, but that was all it took. He lost much of the use of his right arm and hand because of his wounds (from an enemy ambush), and frankly I do not know how he came out of it alive, since many of the men with him were killed. There are a LOT of details that I do not know regarding his tour in Vietnam, and I may never know more than I know now, because I respect him too much to bother him about the horrors he experienced there.
To see this piece of garbage claim to have served this country as a "Navy SEAL," and was wounded a bunch of times, and was awarded the Navy Cross, and the rest of it just angers me. He talks about it so cavalierly, so matter-of-factly, and so blatently PROUD about it, that there can be no doubt that this "man" seriously needs to be put in his place.
Sutter, if you read this, I just want you to know that if you actually do believe in God, that you're going to get your comeuppance someday, and you WILL answer for your theft of so many other men's true honor, and your moral bankruptcy.
Well, it's been six weeks now since Jeanette made her phony claim that she had my service record, and she has still not posted my DD-214, which is the only record of time and rank in service that the Navy sends out. To anyone who still believes her claim, I have a bridge for sale, in Brooklyn.
Lady P-
I hope your posting means things are looking up for you. What a heartbreaking story. Sutter showed himself again to be such a piece of garbage in his post about it.
"rev" Jim, the burden of proof does not rest upon Lady Predator. It rests upon YOU. You have claimed all of this stuff about having a 28-year, award-winning career in the Navy, without even a trace of evidence to substantiate it.
You have enjoyed a miserable cottage industry of dropping names and your so-called "professional" accreditations, to fool people into thinking that you are some sort of uber-expert on numerous subjects, rather than the pathetic loser that you ARE.
You are being called out to prove who you are, but all you can do is say that nobody can prove what they say. If you had a 28-year career in the Navy, YOU could put it all to rest. The fact that you cannot do that is proof enough that you are a habitual liar.
Lady Predator is right. You are as far from God as anyone ever could. You are a petty, self-serving troll. There is a deep, ever-growing hole in your soul and heart that will consume you before long. If you actually believe in anything other than your own lies, you need to embrace it before it is too late.
I have just read a blog article regarding Dr. M. Scott Peck's book "People of the Lie," and I found several quotations from it do apply to the issue of Mr. Sutter and his penchants. Allow me to list several of these:
An illness or disease is [defined as] any defect in the structure of our bodies or personalities that prevents us from fulfilling our potential as human beings. For the label of disease implies that the disorder is not inevitable, that healing should be possible, that it should be studied scientifically and methods of treatment should be sought. The designation of evil as a disease also obligates us to approach the evil with compassion. . . Evil is distinguished by:
a) consistent destructive, scapegoating behavior, which may often be quite subtle.
b) excessive, albeit usually covert, intolerance to criticism . . .
c) pronounced concern with a public image and self-image of respectability . .
d) intellectual deviousness . . (p. 126-129)
It is not their sins per se that characterize evil people; rather, it is the subtlety and persistence and consistency of their sins. This is because the central defect of the evil is not the sin but the refusal to acknowledge it. (p. 69)
If evil people cannot be defined by the illegality of their deeds or the magnitude of their sins, then how are we to define them? The answer is by the consistency of their sins. While usually subtle, their destructiveness is remarkably consistent. This is because those who have “crossed the line” are characterized by their absolute refusal to tolerate the sense of their own sinfulness. (p. 71)
The reader will be struck by the extraordinary willfulness of evil people. . . There is a remarkable power in the manner in which they attempt to control others. . . Perhaps the evil are born so inherently strong-willed that it is impossible for them to ever to submit their will.
The evil in this world is committed by the spiritual fat cats, by the Pharisees of our own day, the self-righteous who think they are without sin because they are unwilling to suffer the discomfort of significant self-examination. . . . They are remarkably greedy people. [T]he most basic sin is laziness. [I]t may be pride – because all sins are repairable except the sin of believing one is without sin. (p. 72)
A predominant characteristic, however, of the behavior of those I call evil is scapegoating. Because in their hearts they consider themselves above reproach, they must lash out at anyone who does reproach them. They sacrifice others to preserve their self-image of perfection. . . Scapegoating works through a mechanism psychiatrists call projection. . . Since they must deny their own evil, they must perceive others as bad. They project their own evil onto the world. They never think of themselves as evil; on the other hand, they consequently see much evil in others. (p. 73-74) (This is perhaps the most obvious issue that distinguishes Mr. Sutter. Every issue that plagues him are thrust upon others who disagree with him.)
As has been noted, it is characteristic of those who are evil to judge others as evil. Unable to acknowledge their own imperfections, they must explain away their flaws by blaming others. And, if necessary, they will even destroy others in the name of righteousness. (p. 255) (Again, Mr. Sutter has done whatever he can to destroy the life and reputation of Jeanette Runyon (Lady Predator), in order to placate his own flaws and deceptions.)
Utterly dedicated to preserving their self-image of perfection, [the evil] are unceasingly engaged in the effort to maintain the appearance of moral purity. They worry about this a great deal. They are acutely sensitive to social norms and what others might think of them. . . While they seem to lack any motivation to be good, they intensely desire to appear good. Their “goodness” is all on a level of pretense. It is, in effect, a lie. This is why they are the “people of the lie.” Yet the self-deceit would be unnecessary if the evil had no sense of right and wrong. We lie only when we are attempting to cover up something we know to be illicit. (p. 75-76) (Hence, we see him building up his resume of supposed accreditations and awards--which cannot be substantiated, and have blogs that propose to combat "hate-speech" websites.)
The evil hate the light – the light of goodness that shows them up, the light of scrutiny that exposes them, the light of truth that penetrates their deception. (p. 77)
The evil are “the people of the lie,” deceiving others as they also build layer upon layer of self-deception. [W]hile evil people are still to be feared, they are also to be pitied. Forever fleeing the light of self-exposure and the voice of their own conscience, they are the most frightened of human beings. (p. 66-67)
The evil always hide their motives with lies. (p. 105)
AND, here is a quotation regarding how to deal with him:
It is vitally necessary that we struggle against evil with all the power at our command. This idea that Satan (and its works), despite all appearances, is actually on the run offers a possible answer to a major question of mine. [How does Satan manifest itself?] It is spirit. . . Satan has no power except in a human body (in this case, Mr. Sutter's body). Satan cannot do evil except through a human body. . . . In fact, the only power that Satan has is through human belief in lies. I know no more accurate epithet for Satan than the Father of Lies. Satan can use any human sin or weakness – greed and pride, for example. . .But its principal weapon is fear. . . "In The Road Less Traveled" I defined mental health as “an ongoing process of dedication to reality at all costs.” Satan is utterly dedicated to opposing that process. In fact, the best definition I have for Satan is that it is a real spirit of unreality. (p. 206-207) (Mr. Sutter's objective is to present himself as one who is who he ISN'T, and we must continually combat him with reality. We must also realize that he is mentally ill, by his lack of acknowledging reality, and lack of any gravity for the damage he commits towards others. He shouldn't be hated, but rather pitied.)
Sutter is a very sick man. In many way, especially of the soul. He needs our prayers. I was praying for him before all this began but stopped fro a while. Now that I am staying with the Sisters of St Joseph I have added his name to their daily prayers. He claims to be a man of God but from I can tell it isn't God who speaks to him.
I have to wonder if the Sisters of St. Joseph know you're using their computer to cyberstalk, and how this would affect your guest status there.
But don't worry, I hear the Ukrainians have a guest room ready and waiting for you.
There is no cyber stalking going on unless we talk about your behavior.
Those who have taken holy orders don't take to kindly to people pretending to be a priest
http://tinyurl.com/yuq3v3
posts where puts CPM after his name pretending to be a Catholic Priest CPM - Congregatio Presbyterorum a Misericordia, the Fathers of Mercy
Sutter says he is a Baptist yet he is claiming to be part of an Roman Catholic Congregation of Priests http://www.fathersofmercy.com/
Check out all this infomation on this fake Reverend Jim Sutter, the Smutter.
http://www.phonyrev.com/
seems he has opened a big can of worms on all his bullshit
Post a Comment