Sutter lies are becoming more obvious as time progresses

The "Rev." Sutter has posted an update in his smear campaign against my friend Lady Predator. So, in her defense, I am going to dispel his lies and fallacies.

First he states that Lady Pred's MySpace page has been removed. This is a complete lie. I was just there a few minutes ago (see, I have this thing about gathering facts). If you try to go to the URL he gives for her MySpace page, you won't get there. Why? Because the URL is a bogus URL which does not exist in the WHOIS database.

UPDATE: 8/16/07 Ms. Runyon's MySpace page which was formerly at myspace.com-ladypredator.com, which was a mirror of her hate sites, has been removed by MySpace administrators.

(emphasis added)
For those not in the know (and this may or may not include Jimmy S. ) A URL has several parts. The main part is what is called the Top Level Domain - or TLD. That is the part that immediately precedes, and includes the extension. There are are plethora of extensions available, but the most common is .com, but there are also, .net, .us, .org...you get the picture. So the TLD for this site, for example, would be "blogspot.com". What comes before the blogspot is called a sub-domain. And browsers today assume that if the user did not type "www" before the rest of the address, that is what is meant, so the "www." is really not necessary any longer.

Okay, armed with factual information about how the web works, we look at the address that Jimmy has given for Lady Pred's MySpace account - myspace.com-ladypredator.com

Now, let us dissect this address. We know the extension given is ".com", before that would be the domain name - which in this case would be "com-ladypredator", and before that the sub-domain.

Doing a quick "whois" search with Network Solutions reveals that the domain "com-ladypredator.com" is available for purchase (or, rather, rent, but don't get me started on that).

Congratulations! The following domains are available
Select available checkboxes to add domains to your order:
com-ladypredator

• .com
• .net
• .mobi
• .org
• .us
• .info
• .biz
• .tv
• .ws
• .bz
• .de
• .co.uk

At any rate. The lying "man of God" (isn't bearing false witness against one of those commandment things?) wants everyone to believe that Lady Pred's MySpace page is no longer available, and his proof is an address, to a domain that does not exist anywhere on the Internet. Lady Pred's MySpace page is actually at "http://www.myspace.com/ladypredator" and anyone can get to it (that is, if your work does not filter MySpace).

His claim about this would be the same as my saying "Blogspot has removed Rev Sutter's hate filled anti-American site because going to the URL http://hatewatchhallof.shame.blogspot.com/ gives you a 404!"

Also, Ms. Runyon's main website at http://ladypredator.com, has now been blocked by another of the major web content filtering services, allowing the hatred there to be blocked from view by schools, libraries, corporations, users of various ISPs, agencies and entities totaling a little over 930,000 in the USA alone.

Notice please, that Jimmy does not give any reference to what "major web content filtering service" he is speaking of. He gives no source for his information. He simply states it as fact and I guess everyone is supposed to believe him.

Note: It is rather amusing that the lying Rev would post that, as *no* one can see my message board unless they join. He is annoyed that he has no clue what is on that message board.

The fact is, I know that libraries do not filter content. ISPs in general do not filter content. They offer tools to allow users to filter content, but the ISPs do not filter the content. They are service providers, not content providers.

Lady Pred's site (http://ladypredator.com) is a forum or discussion board (sorry for not dropping by more often LP). Most corporations I know of filter the majority of forums. This is not because of the content of the forums, it is because they want their employees working and not chatting it up online when they should be working.

He completes his update with:

It is rumored that Microsoft is moving forward with development of a filter for Internet Explorer that will block hate speech, racist writings, pornography, and sites espousing violent religious extremism. Once activated, which will happen with a routine update, trying to access these sites will result in a 404 page.

So now Microsoft is going to take on the role of the net nanny? What kind of crack are they selling in Ohio these days? Microsoft filtering content. What a laugh. Again, please note that he does not give any source for this statement. He doesn't give a link or a quote from anyone. He simply states it, and I suppose everyone is supposed to think it is true.


Let us recap the lies contained in this update:

1. Lady Pred's MySpace page is not a mirror of anything (in fact, it is woefully empty).

Note: My MySpace profile was taken down *again* but the phony rev gives himself away as the pathetic loser he. There is *no* hate speech on the profile. But there are links to Blogs Sutter personality disapproves of. Every two four weeks the profile get deleted and I just put it back up links and all. Here is the new page which is exactly like the old page Note the lack of hate speech. Sutter's definition of hate speech is a link to my message board, Foehammer's Anvil and TheReligionofPeace.com However this little gem provides proof of Sutter's stalking and will be added to the identity theft criminal report I filed on him. Also now MySpace has the name of the Sheriff and the report number of the criminal complaint I made regarding Sutter.

1. He wants everyone to believe that a URL that has never existed is proof that MySpace has closed her page (again, I was just there a few minutes ago, and it is alive and kicking).


2. He emphatically states that a "major web content filtering service" has blocked content from ladypredator.com - but refuses to reveal whom it was, or where his information comes from. (okay, that one may not be a lie, but there is no way to verify it - and given that everything else is a lie, I find it safe and prudent to accept this statement as a lie also)

1. That Microsoft is setting itself up to be the thought police, the Ministry of Truth, so to speak.

ed: Fixed link to the HDDWeb document. - bigisibling


Stay Free, and Stay Sane People!
=Bigsibling

Sutter's rants are not getting any more intelligent...

In this latest post, the 'Rev.' Jim Sutter makes some humongous leaps of logic, and many glaring mis-conclusions.

First off is his use of the word 'racism'. Dictionary.com defines racism as:

rac·ism (ra'siz'?m)
n.

1. The belief that race accounts for differences in human character or ability and that a particular race is superior to others.
   
2. Discrimination or prejudice based on race.

Now Sutter states in his article:

However, CAIR was far from the first to complain about his racism, and his racism encompasses at least four religions.

How can one be racist against a religion ( or religions ) that encompass many different races? By this statement, Sutter is saying that Mormons, or Jehovah's Witnesses, or Scientologists or Muslims are only of one race. That is by far a more bigoted stereotypical statement than I have seen or heard in quite awhile. I am certain that the black, Asian, et al. members of the aforementioned religions would be greatly offended by his assumption, and outright declaration, that these religions allow only one race to participate.

He takes what the TV station that canceled Keller says as gospel. I mean, why wouldn't a television station just come right out and say "yeah, we cow-towed to the Muslims (or other special interests), and we'll do it again." No, the television station would do everything it can to keep people from knowing that if the minority flavor of the month (it is Muslims at this point) complain, they will give in.

Furthermore, he draws all the wrong conclusions from the story. But I can't ask him about it on his site, because he doesn't allow my comments to get through, that is why I'm here. Maybe he can read this, and answer some of my question. While I'm certain he will read this, I'm almost equally certain, he will remain silent because his bigotry and hate cannot survive in the light of truth and facts.

He closes with this remark:

A miscellaneous question - why is it that bigots scream that they are protected by Free Speech, yet no one else is? Whenever anyone tries to object to their bigotry, it’s "jihad", "terror tactics", "censorship" or something similar.

Since you can't seem to figure it out Jimmy, I'll tell you why people scream "censorship" in a case like this, and in all of your cases. Because you and CAIR and the others in your corner are not simply objecting to the speech of others. You are not simply saying "what you are saying is wrong and here is why." No, what you and CAIR and the others in your corner are doing is one of the most Un-American things I can think of to do. That is you are trying to completely shut down those who speak up in opposition to your viewpoint. You would like nothing better than for all speech that you deem wrong to be shut down and silenced...forever. You and CAIR and those in your corner would like only acceptable speech - that which you people deem acceptable, to be uttered. And it is terror tactics, and you are completely and unabashedly guilty of this, calling someone a racist when they, in fact, are not and are only espousing differing viewpoints. You hope that by pulling out the ad-hominem attack of calling someone a racist, it will frighten (terrorize) them into submission. That by (completely) misusing the term to attack your detractors, they will back down for fear (terror) of being labeled a racist. So, yes, it is terror tactics you use, and it is called so justly.

In addition, when CAIR demands the silencing of those who point out that Islamofacists exist, and they are a danger not only to the American way of life, but the free world as a whole, that is jihadist in nature. They declare war on anyone who doesn't say that Islam is a perfect religion of peace. That, Jimmy, is why people say what they do, and respond as they respond. Not because they disagree with what you say, it is your actions, specifically, the actions of attempting to shut down any detractors, that cause them to cry foul.