Showing posts with label lies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label lies. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 14, 2015

Sutter lies are becoming more obvious as time progresses

The "Rev." Sutter has posted an update in his smear campaign against my friend Lady Predator. So, in her defense, I am going to dispel his lies and fallacies.

First he states that Lady Pred's MySpace page has been removed. This is a complete lie. I was just there a few minutes ago (see, I have this thing about gathering facts). If you try to go to the URL he gives for her MySpace page, you won't get there. Why? Because the URL is a bogus URL which does not exist in the WHOIS database.
UPDATE: 8/16/07 Ms. Runyon's MySpace page which was formerly at myspace.com-ladypredator.com, which was a mirror of her hate sites, has been removed by MySpace administrators.

(emphasis added)
For those not in the know (and this may or may not include Jimmy S. ) A URL has several parts. The main part is what is called the Top Level Domain - or TLD. That is the part that immediately precedes, and includes the extension. There are are plethora of extensions available, but the most common is .com, but there are also, .net, .us, .org...you get the picture. So the TLD for this site, for example, would be "blogspot.com". What comes before the blogspot is called a sub-domain. And browsers today assume that if the user did not type "www" before the rest of the address, that is what is meant, so the "www." is really not necessary any longer.

Okay, armed with factual information about how the web works, we look at the address that Jimmy has given for Lady Pred's MySpace account - myspace.com-ladypredator.com

Now, let us dissect this address. We know the extension given is ".com", before that would be the domain name - which in this case would be "com-ladypredator", and before that the sub-domain.

Doing a quick "whois" search with Network Solutions reveals that the domain "com-ladypredator.com" is available for purchase (or, rather, rent, but don't get me started on that).
Congratulations! The following domains are available
Select available checkboxes to add domains to your order:
com-ladypredator
  • .com
  • .net
  • .mobi
  • .org
  • .us
  • .info
  • .biz
  • .tv
  • .ws
  • .bz
  • .de
  • .co.uk

At any rate. The lying "man of God" (isn't bearing false witness against one of those commandment things?) wants everyone to believe that Lady Pred's MySpace page is no longer available, and his proof is an address, to a domain that does not exist anywhere on the Internet. Lady Pred's MySpace page is actually at "http://www.myspace.com/ladypredator" and anyone can get to it (that is, if your work does not filter MySpace).

His claim about this would be the same as my saying "Blogspot has removed Rev Sutter's hate filled anti-American site because going to the URL http://hatewatchhallof.shame.blogspot.com/ gives you a 404!"
Also, Ms. Runyon's main website at http://ladypredator.com, has now been blocked by another of the major web content filtering services, allowing the hatred there to be blocked from view by schools, libraries, corporations, users of various ISPs, agencies and entities totaling a little over 930,000 in the USA alone.

Notice please, that Jimmy does not give any reference to what "major web content filtering service" he is speaking of. He gives no source for his information. He simply states it as fact and I guess everyone is supposed to believe him.

Note: It is rather amusing that the lying Rev would post that, as *no* one can see my message board unless they join. He is annoyed that he has no clue what is on that message board.

The fact is, I know that libraries do not filter content. ISPs in general do not filter content. They offer tools to allow users to filter content, but the ISPs do not filter the content. They are service providers, not content providers.

Lady Pred's site (http://ladypredator.com) is a forum or discussion board (sorry for not dropping by more often LP). Most corporations I know of filter the majority of forums. This is not because of the content of the forums, it is because they want their employees working and not chatting it up online when they should be working.

He completes his update with:
It is rumored that Microsoft is moving forward with development of a filter for Internet Explorer that will block hate speech, racist writings, pornography, and sites espousing violent religious extremism. Once activated, which will happen with a routine update, trying to access these sites will result in a 404 page.

So now Microsoft is going to take on the role of the net nanny? What kind of crack are they selling in Ohio these days? Microsoft filtering content. What a laugh. Again, please note that he does not give any source for this statement. He doesn't give a link or a quote from anyone. He simply states it, and I suppose everyone is supposed to think it is true.


Let us recap the lies contained in this update:
  1. Lady Pred's MySpace page is not a mirror of anything (in fact, it is woefully empty).
Note: My MySpace profile was taken down *again* but the phony rev gives himself away as the pathetic loser he. There is *no* hate speech on the profile. But there are links to Blogs Sutter personality disapproves of. Every two four weeks the profile get deleted and I just put it back up links and all. Here is the new page which is exactly like the old page Note the lack of hate speech. Sutter's definition of hate speech is a link to my message board, Foehammer's Anvil and TheReligionofPeace.com However this little gem provides proof of Sutter's stalking and will be added to the identity theft criminal report I filed on him. Also now MySpace has the name of the Sheriff and the report number of the criminal complaint I made regarding Sutter.

  1. He wants everyone to believe that a URL that has never existed is proof that MySpace has closed her page (again, I was just there a few minutes ago, and it is alive and kicking).

  2. He emphatically states that a "major web content filtering service" has blocked content from ladypredator.com - but refuses to reveal whom it was, or where his information comes from. (okay, that one may not be a lie, but there is no way to verify it - and given that everything else is a lie, I find it safe and prudent to accept this statement as a lie also)

  1. That Microsoft is setting itself up to be the thought police, the Ministry of Truth, so to speak.

ed: Fixed link to the HDDWeb document. - bigisibling


Stay Free, and Stay Sane People!
=Bigsibling

Saturday, October 25, 2008

The Fraudulent "Rev" Perjurs Himself and Abuses the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA)

Those of us who know the pretend "rev" and Navy Seal impostor are not surprised at that he would lie to keep the truth about himself off the web and away from the public. Mr Sutter like many frauds on the web today has been abusing the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) to stop freedom of speech and prevent the truth about him being revealed to the public. Mr. Sutter LIED in order to get snapshots of himself pulled off several different web severs. Mr. Sutter is the subject of these snapshots not the copyright owner as he claims. My use those photos is legally protected because it falls within the "fair use" provision of the copyright regulations, as defined in 17 USC 107. Perhaps Mr. Sutter needs a refresher course in copyright laws.

Question: Can the subject of a photograph use the DMCA 512 takedown process?

Answer: Generally, no. Only the copyright owner or an authorized representative of the copyright owner can send a DMCA takedown notice. The copyright in a photograph belongs initially to the person who took the photo, not the person who is pictured. Unless the photo subject has gotten an assignment of copyright or permission to act on behalf of the photographer, it is improper for him or her to send a DMCA takedown notice.

Technorati Tags:, , , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, September 25, 2007

Where does he come up with this stuff?

BRILLIANT! Absolutely BRILLIANT!

This guy, the "Rev" Jim Sutter, he comes up with the greatest tales. I wait with great anticipation to see what he will come up with next! Much of it is so priceless!

In a recent article "You'd Be Amazed Who's Reading this Blog" Sutter eludes to the possibility that people he is investigating (i.e. Foehammer, Robert Spencer, Lady Predator and Cristy Li) are going to be extradited to The Hague and charged with either "war crimes", "crimes against humanity" or both. Yeah, I know, this guy is a laugh riot! He could write for NBC and bring back "Must See TV" on Thursdays if he would put his imagination and talent into making stories for TV instead of trying to pass them off as fact for those that are gullible enough to fall for his fiction.

If you don't want to waste time reading his post, here is the Cliff Notes version:
Sutter is notified (by whom is a complete mystery) to expect contact from an investigator from the United Nations' International Criminal Court.
He spends two hours being interviewed by the ICC investigators.
He will not say who is being investigated or for what.
He gives all kinds of links which he says show that ordinary American citizens are subject to the ICC.

The implication is that if an American exercises their right to free speech (as the folks listed above do on a regular basis), then they can be extradited to The Hague and tried.

This is completely false. The only things Americans can be tried in the ICC for are war crimes and crimes against humanity. And only if those are 1) committed on foreign soil (i.e. not committed in the USA) and 2) the country in which the crimes were committed choose not to prosecute the individual.

Let us amuse ourselves a little and pretend that expressing one's First Amendment right is considered a "war crime" or a "crime against humanity" in some other country. It isn't, and we all know it isn't, but let's travel to Sutter's little land of Make Believe, and pretend it is. The ICC would still not have jurisdiction because they are doing their dastardly deeds in the USA. They reside in the USA, they have blogs on servers in the USA. And we have seen where Canadian bloggers are flocking to servers hosted in the USA to avoid Canadian restrictions on their so-called right to free speech.

We have also seen where the US Court of Appeals has held that an American's rights, as far as publishing goes, does not stop at the border.

I am completely certain that Mr. Sutter would like nothing more than for his fantasies of being interviewed by ICC investigators targeting American citizens, and that there is a grand clandestine cabal of people who are fervently working behind the scenes to take him down, to be true. But sadly, it is just isn't. None of it.

=Bigsibling


Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, September 11, 2007

When did the IDF Start Training the Disabled?

Over the years since Sutter first made his appearance on the web he had made many claims. I just thought we would do a little stroll down memory lane.

The first of Sutter's greatest hits is this little post he made in August of 1995
I am now a civilian, but I served my country, and received the Navy Cross, (the highest award from the Navy), the Dept of Defense Medal of Valor, and the Purple Heart. So I like to think that I am somewhat qualified to speak to "espirit de corps".

There is just one problem with Sutter's claim he just isn't on the
list of persons who received the Navy Cross. Oh well.

In May of 2004 Sutter posted this little gem on Bush_Kicks_A_S_S_on_Terrorism yahoo group (note Sutter has recently gone back into that group and deleted all the posts he made there...guilty conscience maybe?).

Let me tell you something that I do not talk about often. I have 4 Purple
Hearts. It took me 26 years of service to earn (yes, earn) them. I was nominated for them by my COs for injuries by hostile forces during combat, resulting in #1 the flesh burned off my legs from the feet to the knees, #2 having a bullet shatter my kneecap, #3 taking 4 bullets in the abdomen, resulting in loss of my gallbladder, part of my liver and intestines and #4 having my elbow shattered by a bullet and minutes later receiving an 8" knife wound in the same arm. Yet I completed my missions in all instances. I have so many prosthetic parts in me that my son calls me RoboPop. I didn't ask for the medals, I didn't ask to be removed from active duty or combat operations, and when I finally retired I put them away in a box with the rest of my medals, (including the Bronze Star, the Combat Medal, the Presidential Unit Citation and the Navy Cross) and left them locked away.

Sutter thinks by sanitizing the yahoo group of his posts he is somehow won't be pinned down for his lies....the only problem is I have a
PDF of his post. Not to mention Yahoo will always maintains the original posts in the event of a court order.

Then there is this wonderful post in March of 2006 by Sutter on the Yahoo group Down with Antisemitism (a group that he was kicked off and I'm still a member)

I spent 26 years in the USN CT ops, graduated the Naval War College, trained with the IDF, and spent more time tracking down and neutralizing terrorists than you have probably spent breathing. I have a solid comprehension of the cultures of the Middle East (along with many other cultures), I read and speak English, Arabic, Chinese (Cantonese), French, German, Italian, Japanese, Russian, Spanish, Latin and Greek. I have a Bachelor's in Nuclear Physics, a Masters in Modern Warfare, Masters in Theology, a Doctorate of Divinity, Doctorate of Biblical Studies, and Ph.D. in Trauma Psychology.
Any other silly questions?

In
another post on December 2006 he goes on to claim:

Actually, I'm fluent in several dialects of Arabic. I notice that, as usual, you fail to provide any factual information with which to support your claims. I, on the other hand, provided direct citations from the Qur'an.

Pretty impressive don't you think? He knows eleven languages or was it eight?

So you're a linguist too? Now I'm going to have to watch my wording or risk getting my knuckles smacked, I suppose. Can I still throw in an occasional quote in one of the eight language that I learned back in the Stone Age

Oh what does it matter eleven, eight, (maybe he was counting those several dialects of Arabic), it's all the same. And did you see; Sutter even trained with the IDF. I wonder if they knew he was disabled?


Sutter claims in March of 2006 to know some "very important people" like CIA director James Woolsey:

Tell Jim that the "Jolly Green Giant" said hello, and that he still owes me twenty bucks from the poker game. Oh, and if you want to keep claiming that you have met the director, you may want to learn to spell his name correctly.

I'm impressed aren't you? Sutter tells some pretty big whoppers!

On Oct 2006 he made this claim on a post to frontpagemag.com
"Let's see,. I only have 26 years in counterterrorism, more medals than you have brain cells, and three doctorates. Yep, you'all must be right, I musta just fell off the haywagon and bumped ma poor head.

On January 15, 2007 at noisyroom.net made another claim abut his qualifications in counter terrorism:
"During 26 years in the USN fighting terrorism, one of the most important lessons we learned was proper target acquisition".

On March 5th, 2007 in a post to the Daily Pundit he made this claim:
"After spending 26 years in counterterrorism, in ops against every kind of terrorist (I estimate that's about 26 years more than Bill Quick spent), I know how to recognize who is the enemy and who is not. Kaufman's tactic of smearing all Muslims as terrorists is not only ridiculous, it is targeted to play best with the uneducated, the fearful, the paranoid, those who check under their bed at night to make sure the bogey man isn't hiding there. Those who are smarter can easily recognize how Kaufman and his ilk play on your fears in order to make a fortune themselves. They don't give a care about you, they only care about their own pockets. That's just one reason why Kaufman is the subject of multiple law enforcement investigations. (BTW, I've been to Afghanistan under the Taliban, it's a shitty little country, probably always will be, but at least they are making some slow progress.)

On April, 2007 at The Bigsibling Blog Sutter again made this claim:

"I spent 26 years in USN counterterrorism, and guarantee that I have killed more terrorists than you have ever dreamed of.

Sutter also seems a little confused as to when he was active duty in the Navy. On Sutter's MySpace profile he claims he served from 1974 to 1996 (clue: the Navy doesn't have two year enlistments) yet on his Zoom page he claims he was USN Active Duty 1974 - 1980. Now that I have posted this I wonder how long it will take Sutter to fix his MySpace profile? It doesn't matter I have a PDF of it any way.

Oh and the little matter of Sutter saying he isn't claiming to be a Navy Seal. Well who does he think does counter terrorisms in the Navy? When Sutter says he was "USN CT ops" he is in fact claiming to be a Navy Seal. Not to mention there is this silliness. Sutter posted pictures of a GI Joe doll saying it was him from his "Navy days" he even labeled the picture JimSeal. Oh no Sutter wasn't claiming to be a Navy Seal was he?



Technorati Tags:, , , , ,
Generated By Technorati Tag Generator


Sunday, July 22, 2007

The "Man of God " Can't Stop Lying.

Mr. Sutter is annoyed, so very annoyed. He doesn't like the fact that his puffery has been exposed for all the world to see.

First of all he makes a very bad attempt at forging an email threat from me. Using a post I sent to Down_with_Antisemitism and cc to several other people as well. It's obliviously forged as he has "me" complaining abut his hatewatchhallofshame where he has "me" writing:
I can forge you into hell if you don't take your stupid hate watch crap off the web

The problem is the email he chose to use as the base for his forgery is dated 1/12/2007; Sutter didn't write his pack 'o lies about me until Saturday, April 07, 2007. Of course there is the fact that he has a history of doing this before:
You have tried to forge private email and turn it into a weapon against people in the past, which is why I will not exchange private email with you.
Then there is this pathetic attempt at forgery, yes that is right Mr Sutter was stupid enough to forge his own medical records and even dumb enough to submit that forgery to a federal judge!

It looks to me like Mr. Sutter is projecting. He's even claiming that I'm using forged-usenet-posts to expose his lies. These posts go back to 1995. I wonder why this is the first time Sutter has complained about those forgeries when they were happening. And how does he get around this post?
If it helps the crdibility any, here are some verifiable facts. My ADA case was filed in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Divison, case caption: James Sutter vs. City of Lakewood, Ohio. Case number 1:94 CV 1857, assigned originally to Judge Leslie Wells, spun off to Judge Peter Economus.

I was ordained December 11, 1994 by the Catholic Life Church program out of Modesto, California. My Ohio license is number 4849, granted December 30, 1994. My supervisory Bishop is Bishop Kirby Hensley. I hold a Doctor of Divinity degree, and a Doctorate in Biblical Studies.


The only forging going on here is by Sutter's own hand. It isn't possible to forge someone's Usenet post and send them twelve years into the past; it's certainly not possible to forge Sutter's two felony convictions since they are available to anyone with an internet connection.

So here we have a "man of God" who can't seem to stop lying. His newest lie; that I was:
recently released from a psychiatric facility.

The last time I was in a psychiatric facility, was when I was working there. I was employed for many years at Metropolitan State Hospital in Norwalk, California (where Sutter claims I was an inpatient for a year). Yet he makes the claim that his hatewatchhallofshame has verifiable facts. Very interesting, that is a verification I would love to see.

This lie is especially pathetic coming from a man who called himself a "reverend"
has your psychiatrist been in touch with you yet? He’s looking for you, something about they released you too soon. Apparently only spending one year in that psychiatric unit wasn’t enough. I gave him your home address, I’m sure it won’t be long till the men in the white coats are knocking at your door - again.
And again here:
having once again been released too early from her inpatient care, violates the restraining order. Remember what they told you last time, Jeanette. Keep violating the order and conditions of your release and they'll have to re-institutionalize you for a long, long time.

Simply put, if the "Rev." wants people to think he really is a man of God he should stop posting lies. He's just making what I do so much more believable.

The "rev." need to read the federal cyberstalking law again, as I've made no threats, nor have I told any lies. Unlike the phony Rev. who has no problem with posting lies. The information I post is true and for educational purposes. Of course Sutter does get annoyed when anyone disagrees with him.

Technorati Tags:, , , , ,
Generated By Technorati Tag Generator